Original Podcast Source

This article summarizes and expands upon the information shared in this podcast discussion featuring host Elaine Mullally in conversation with Irish General Practitioners Dr. Pat Morrissey and Dr. Billy Ralph, recorded on March 22, 2025.

Detailed Timeline of COVID-19 Events in Ireland

2020: The Beginning of the Pandemic

  • Early 2020: COVID-19 pandemic begins to impact Ireland
  • January 2020: Dr. Billy Ralph implements Vitamin D supplementation for elderly patients based on strong evidence of its protective effect on the innate immune system
  • Throughout 2020: Dr. Pat Morrissey treats COVID-19 patients with repurposed medications
  • Spring/Summer 2020: Dr. Billy Ralph observes unusual respiratory illnesses in his practice
  • April 2020: Significant spike in deaths in Ireland coincides with the transfer of sick elderly individuals from hospitals to nursing homes, leading to overcrowding and resource shortages
  • Overall 2020: No significant excess deaths in Ireland for the entire year except for the April spike; Central Statistics Office reports only 61 deaths with COVID-19 as the sole cause on death certificates

2021: Vaccine Rollout and Emerging Concerns

  • Early 2021: mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 therapies are rolled out across Ireland
  • Vaccination Strategy: Dr. Ralph advocates for targeted vaccination of elderly and vulnerable populations only, advising against vaccination for those who had recovered from COVID-19
  • Shortly After Vaccine Rollout: Dr. Morrissey begins observing unusual illness patterns in his practice
  • From July 2021 Onward: Ireland experiences consistent double-figure excess deaths every month according to analysis of RIP.ie data
  • Throughout 2021: Both doctors connect with international scientists and clinicians sharing similar concerns about vaccine adverse effects
  • Late 2021: Doctors begin to observe increased rates of cardiovascular issues requiring interventions at younger ages

Ongoing Developments (2022 onwards)

  • Irish medical profession remains largely unwilling to discuss potential issues related to COVID-19 vaccines
  • Independent laboratory analyses raise concerns about contaminants in vaccine batches
  • Dr. Morrissey observes significant increase in patients requiring aggressive anticoagulation
  • Patrick Walsh's analysis indicates consistent 15-18% excess death rate in Ireland
  • Estimated 22,000-23,000 excess deaths in the Republic of Ireland since mid-2021
  • Several US states begin considering legislation to ban mRNA injections in humans and animals
  • Ireland reports second-highest cancer rates in Europe in 2022 according to Irish Cancer Society figures

The Truth About COVID-19 Shots: A Candid Discussion with Irish Doctors

In a rare moment of medical candor, two experienced Irish general practitioners have stepped forward to share their clinical observations and concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines. Dr. Pat Morrissey (Adare, Co. Limerick) and Dr. Billy Ralph (Wexford) bring decades of combined medical experience to this discussion, offering insights that challenge prevailing narratives about vaccine safety and efficacy.

This article presents their perspectives on potential adverse effects following COVID-19 injections, mechanisms of harm, the suppression of early alternative treatments, and the alarming rise in excess deaths in Ireland since mid-2021.

Changing Patterns of Illness: Before and After Vaccine Rollout

The 2020 Experience: Limited COVID Impact

Host Elaine Mullally opened the discussion by sharing her personal observations: "What I witnessed in 2020 was not very many people getting sick... since 2021... I have witnessed a lot more people being sick." This anecdotal observation aligned with the doctors' professional experiences.

Dr. Billy Ralph explained that in early 2020, he took proactive measures with his elderly patients, prescribing Vitamin D based on "very strong" evidence of its protective effect on the innate immune system. He noted that the "numbers needed to treat" for keeping elderly patients out of the hospital with Vitamin D was comparable to or better than the flu vaccine.

Both doctors reported using repurposed medications for COVID-19 patients in 2020, with generally positive outcomes. Importantly, they observed that despite media narratives of overwhelming illness, 2020 did not show significant excess mortality in Ireland outside of a spike in April, which coincided with the transfer of sick elderly patients from hospitals to under-resourced nursing homes.

Post-Vaccine Rollout: Unusual Illness Patterns Emerge

Dr. Morrissey described a marked shift after the introduction of mRNA and viral vector therapies in 2021: "I very quickly began to see patterns of illness that were quite unusual... the evidence has continued to mount since then and there's been international research into the sequelae of these shots..."

These unusual patterns included:

  • Post-viral fatigue syndromes: Chronic fatigue, poor exercise tolerance, and brain fog
  • Autoimmune manifestations: New autoimmune diseases or flares of existing conditions
  • Vascular events: Strokes and blood clots (particularly associated with Janssen/AstraZeneca vaccines)
  • Cardiovascular issues: Increased myocarditis and accelerated ischemic heart disease in younger patients
  • Cancer concerns: Emerging links to various cancers with understood mechanisms

Dr. Ralph corroborated these observations, noting an unusual prevalence of respiratory illnesses in late spring and summer of 2021, typically outside the normal seasonal pattern.

Mainstream Medicine's Limited Response

Both doctors expressed frustration that mainstream medicine has "very little to offer" patients experiencing these post-vaccine health issues. Dr. Morrissey noted that many patients are left without adequate treatment options, while Dr. Ralph highlighted the reluctance within the medical community to even discuss these potential adverse effects.

Scientific Concerns: What's in the Vaccines?

Batch Variability and Toxicity Patterns

Dr. Morrissey referenced a Danish paper by Dr. Schmelling indicating a "tripartite division" in vaccine batch toxicity:

  • Approximately 5% of batches caused around 80% of serious adverse effects
  • 60-65% of batches were associated with hardly any toxicity
  • A middle group accounted for 20-25% of reported toxicity

This pattern, he suggested, raises questions about potential "planning or coordination" rather than mere quality control issues. Dr. Morrissey advised that individuals who experienced significant adverse reactions after their initial doses should be particularly cautious about additional shots.

Concerning Contaminants and Components

Dr. Ralph shared findings from independent laboratory analyses by scientists including Kevin McKernan and Dr. David Speicher, revealing:

  • Bacterial DNA contamination: Levels "hundreds of times higher" than FDA/EMA limits (exceeding the 10 nanograms per dose limit)
  • Delivery mechanism concerns: DNA enclosed in lipid nanoparticles, potentially allowing cell and nuclear entry
  • SV40 promoter sequence: Presence of a Simian Virus 40 promoter sequence, used in gene therapy to integrate genetic material

He explained: "The DNA is not naked DNA, it's inside the lipid nanoparticle which means it gets inside the human cell and then theoretically that can go inside the human nucleus and incorporate into the human genome... something that would facilitate it entering the nucleus and entering genetic material of human beings was found by Dr. David Speicher... and it's part of a virus called Simian virus 40."

Dr. Ralph also discussed the use of N1-methylpseudouridine in the mRNA, which can cause "frame shifting" during protein synthesis, potentially leading to the production of unknown proteins beyond the intended Spike protein. This contradicts the initial claim that the injections would only produce the specific Spike protein.

Refuting Claims of Localized Effects

Both doctors challenged the assertion that the vaccine material stays localized at the injection site. Dr. Ralph specifically stated that the material "goes everywhere" in the body and continues to produce Spike protein for an extended period. This contradicts early public health messaging about how the vaccines would function in the body.

Mechanisms of Harm: The Spike Protein Problem

Dr. Morrissey explained that the injections deliver genetic code for Spike protein production by the body's cells in "completely undeterminable" doses. Two primary mechanisms of harm were highlighted:

1. Chronic Inflammation

The persistent presence of Spike protein (detected up to 706 days post-vaccination in a Yale study) can lead to ongoing inflammation, resulting in:

  • Fatigue and "burnout"
  • Brain fog and cognitive issues
  • Joint soreness and musculoskeletal pain
  • Poor exercise tolerance
  • Mitochondrial dysfunction

Dr. Morrissey explained that this chronic inflammation occurs because the body's inflammatory response may not be adequately turned off, potentially due to the modified RNA persisting for an extended period.

2. IgG4 Immunosuppression

A shift in antibody response that may contribute to:

  • Prolonged illnesses
  • Potentially higher cancer rates
  • Reduced immune surveillance

Dr. Ralph added concerns about Spike protein potentially damaging tumor suppressor genes (p53) and interfering with BRCA genes, with implications for cancer development. He referenced studies suggesting these mechanisms could explain the observed increase in various cancer types.

Potential Remedies for Spike Protein Detoxification

Dr. Morrissey shared Dr. Peter McCullough's protocol for helping clear Spike protein:

  • Nattokinase: 4,000 units at night on an empty stomach (with caution for those on blood thinners)
  • Bromelain: A proteolytic enzyme from pineapple
  • Curcumin: An anti-inflammatory compound from turmeric

All three are derived from food sources and work through different mechanisms to potentially help clear the Spike protein. Dr. Morrissey emphasized that nattokinase, as a proteolytic enzyme, may be particularly effective in dissolving Spike protein but advised consultation with a doctor before starting any new supplement regimen, especially for individuals on blood thinners.

The Excess Death Crisis in Ireland

Perhaps most alarming was the doctors' discussion of excess mortality in Ireland since mid-2021. Citing Patrick Walsh's analysis of RIP.ie data, they noted:

  • A consistent 15-18% excess death rate since July 2021
  • An estimated 22,000-23,000 total excess deaths in the Republic of Ireland
  • A correlation between vaccination rates and excess mortality across European countries

Dr. Ralph expressed frustration at the "total silence" from health authorities and the "white wash" explanation from the Central Statistics Office attributing 2021 excess deaths to an HSE computer malfunction.

Dr. Morrissey noted: "If you were to look at the vaccination rates, you'd see that excess death correlates with vaccination rates in Europe... Bulgaria and Romania... did not have an excess mortality issue."

International Context and Additional Evidence

The doctors referenced additional sources including:

  • A controversial BMJ paper showing rising excess mortality despite vaccine rollout
  • Collateral Global's estimate of 17 million global excess deaths linked to the injections, based on work by Canadian statistician Dr. Denis Rancourt
  • Edward Dowd's research on increased death and disability in vaccinated workers
  • Substantial increases in illness and disability claims in Ireland since 2020

Dr. Ralph specifically critiqued claims that the vaccines saved thousands of lives, referencing mathematician Norman Fenton's critique of Johnny Ioannidis's modeling-based paper, suggesting these estimates were based on flawed modeling rather than real-world data.

Early Treatments Sidelined

Both doctors expressed concern that effective early treatments were "purposely pushed to one side" to promote novel gene therapies under Emergency Use Authorization, which required that no alternative treatments be available.

Dr. Morrissey referenced a 2003 paper showing Hydroxychloroquine's effectiveness against SARS-CoV-1, noting Anthony Fauci's awareness of this research. He cited the case of Ivermectin use in Uttar Pradesh, India, associated with lower death rates.

Dr. Ralph highlighted Dr. Tess Lawrie's meta-analysis suggesting Ivermectin was "worthwhile using" and noted the "significant and unexplained price increase" of Ivermectin during the pandemic. Both doctors used repurposed drugs like Ivermectin in 2020 with positive results in their practices.

Financial Incentives and Medical Silence

Dr. Ralph raised concerns about financial incentives potentially influencing medical perspectives, noting that doctors could earn €6,000-€16,000 for a morning's work administering COVID-19 and flu vaccines.

Both doctors expressed frustration with what Dr. Ralph called a "weird closed off world where nobody wants to talk" about potential vaccine-related issues or rising cancer rates, despite Ireland having the second-highest cancer rates in Europe in 2022.

Dr. Ralph found it "absolutely astonishing" that the international network of "highly reputable scientists and clinicians" sharing similar concerns had "gone from this highly reputable career with multiple accolades to overnight being all quacks."

Lack of Discussion About Rising Cancer Rates

Dr. Ralph specifically mentioned attending a Continuing Medical Education (CME) meeting where Ireland's high cancer rates were presented (second highest in Europe in 2022 according to Irish Cancer Society figures), yet there was "complete silence" and no discussion about potential causes. He found this concerning for a high GDP country with a relatively young population and criticized the lack of investigation into these alarming statistics.

The Roy Butler Case

Dr. Morrissey discussed the case of Roy Butler, a young man from Waterford who died shortly after receiving the Janssen injection. Despite the State Pathologist Margaret Bolster being "baffled" by the cause of death and finding no connection to the vaccine, Dr. Morrissey noted the public understanding of a likely link and mentioned around 20 other similar cases referenced in the inquest.

This case highlights the tension between official determinations and public perceptions regarding vaccine-related adverse events, with Dr. Morrissey suggesting that the temporal relationship between vaccination and death in these cases warrants more thorough investigation.

Looking Forward: Hopeful Developments and Personal Health Responsibility

Dr. Morrissey mentioned some positive developments, including legislation progressing in several US states to ban all mRNA injections in humans and animals. However, he also expressed concern about the UN's "One Health" agenda pushing mRNA vaccinations in animals, potentially impacting the food chain.

Both doctors emphasized the importance of personal responsibility for health, stressing lifestyle factors (diet, sleep, exercise, stress management, social connections) over sole reliance on medical interventions. They offered a critique of the "biomedical paradigm" that focuses primarily on pharmaceutical interventions rather than holistic health approaches.

Vaccination Strategy Disagreements

Dr. Ralph shared that he had advocated for a targeted vaccination approach, recommending the vaccines primarily for elderly and vulnerable populations while advising against vaccination for those who had already recovered from COVID-19. This position differed from the mass vaccination strategy that was ultimately implemented.

He noted that a significant percentage (around 10% or less) of healthcare staff providing direct care chose not to take these vaccines, indicating concerns within the healthcare sector itself. Dr. Ralph suggested this should have prompted more investigation rather than mandates and pressure.

Healthcare Worker Vaccination Concerns

Dr. Ralph pointed out that approximately 10% or less of healthcare staff providing direct patient care chose not to take the COVID-19 vaccines despite facing significant professional pressure. He suggested this reluctance among medical professionals should have prompted more investigation into potential safety concerns rather than mandates and coercion.

Lockdown Effects vs. Vaccine Effects

Both doctors addressed the common explanation that increased illness rates were primarily due to lockdowns and delayed medical screenings. While acknowledging these factors played a role, they found this explanation insufficient to account for the patterns they were observing. Dr. Morrissey specifically noted that the rise in all cancer categories, including less common ones, contradicted the delayed screening theory, which would primarily affect common cancers like breast, colon, and prostate.

Vitamin D and Preventative Approaches

Dr. Ralph elaborated on his early use of Vitamin D supplementation for elderly patients in January 2020, explaining that the evidence for its protective effect on the innate immune system was compelling. He noted that the "numbers needed to treat" (NNT) for Vitamin D in preventing hospitalization was comparable to or better than the flu vaccine, making it a cost-effective intervention with minimal risk.

He expressed frustration that this simple, inexpensive preventative measure was not more widely promoted during the pandemic, despite substantial evidence supporting its efficacy in reducing COVID-19 severity. Dr. Ralph suggested that the focus on novel pharmaceutical interventions may have overshadowed proven nutritional approaches to immune support.

Specific Adverse Effects Observed

The doctors detailed specific patterns of adverse effects they had observed following COVID-19 vaccination:

Cardiovascular Issues

  • Myocarditis and Pericarditis: Particularly in younger males after mRNA vaccines
  • Accelerated Ischemic Heart Disease: Cases requiring intervention at younger ages than typically expected
  • Atrial Fibrillation: New onset in previously healthy individuals
  • Blood Clotting Disorders: Particularly associated with viral vector vaccines (AstraZeneca/Janssen)

Neurological Concerns

  • Persistent Headaches: Often resistant to standard treatments
  • Cognitive Dysfunction: "Brain fog," memory issues, and concentration problems
  • Neuropathies: Including unusual patterns of nerve pain and dysfunction
  • Tremors and Movement Disorders: In some cases resembling Parkinson's-like symptoms

Immune System Dysregulation

  • Autoimmune Conditions: New onset or flares of existing conditions
  • Persistent Infections: Suggesting compromised immune function
  • Unusual Allergic Responses: Including to substances previously tolerated
  • Reactivation of Latent Viruses: Including herpes viruses and Epstein-Barr

Cancer Concerns

Dr. Ralph specifically mentioned concerns about potential cancer promotion mechanisms, including:

  • Interference with tumor suppressor genes (p53)
  • Potential impact on BRCA genes
  • Reduced immune surveillance due to IgG4 class switching
  • Chronic inflammation creating an environment conducive to cancer development

Detailed Analysis of Vaccine Components

Dr. Ralph provided a more technical explanation of concerning elements found in the vaccines:

DNA Contamination Issues

The bacterial DNA contamination found by Kevin McKernan was not merely present in trace amounts but exceeded regulatory limits by orders of magnitude. Dr. Ralph explained that this DNA was particularly concerning because:

  1. It was enclosed within lipid nanoparticles, facilitating cellular entry
  2. The presence of the SV40 promoter sequence could potentially facilitate integration into the human genome
  3. The contamination was inconsistent with good manufacturing practices for biological products

Modified RNA Concerns

The use of N1-methylpseudouridine in the mRNA vaccines was highlighted as potentially problematic because:

  1. It extends the half-life of the mRNA, potentially leading to prolonged Spike protein production
  2. It can cause "frame shifting" during protein synthesis, potentially leading to the production of unintended proteins
  3. The body may not effectively clear this modified RNA, leading to persistent presence

Comparison with Traditional Vaccines

Both doctors emphasized that their concerns were specific to the novel mRNA and viral vector technologies, not traditional vaccine approaches. Dr. Ralph noted that conventional vaccines have established safety profiles over decades, while these new platforms represented a significant departure from traditional vaccinology.

Dr. Morrissey pointed out that these products technically did not meet the traditional definition of vaccines but were more accurately described as gene therapies, a distinction he felt was deliberately obscured in public messaging.

Regulatory and Oversight Failures

The doctors expressed concern about what they perceived as regulatory failures, including:

  • Inadequate safety monitoring systems
  • Dismissal of safety signals without proper investigation
  • Lack of transparency regarding adverse event data
  • Conflicts of interest within regulatory bodies
  • Suppression of scientific debate and discussion

Dr. Ralph specifically mentioned the concerning practice of regulatory agencies extending emergency use authorizations despite mounting safety concerns and the failure to properly investigate batch variability issues.

Informed Consent Issues

A significant ethical concern raised by both doctors was the issue of informed consent. They argued that patients were not adequately informed about:

  • The experimental nature of the technology
  • Potential risks and mechanisms of harm
  • Alternatives to vaccination
  • The limited liability of manufacturers
  • The preliminary nature of efficacy and safety data

Dr. Morrissey emphasized that proper informed consent is a cornerstone of medical ethics and expressed concern that this principle had been compromised during the vaccine rollout.

Professional Consequences of Speaking Out

Both doctors acknowledged the professional risks associated with sharing their observations and concerns. Dr. Ralph noted that many medical professionals with similar concerns remained silent due to fear of professional repercussions, including potential loss of licensure or hospital privileges.

Dr. Morrissey described connecting with an international network of physicians and scientists who had faced significant professional consequences for raising questions about vaccine safety, including:

  • Loss of academic positions
  • Removal from medical boards
  • Public discrediting and character assassination
  • Threats to medical licensure
  • Exclusion from professional organizations

Despite these risks, both doctors felt a professional and ethical obligation to share their observations and concerns with the public.

Broader Implications for Medical Science

The doctors discussed the broader implications of their observations for medical science and public health:

Scientific Method Concerns

Dr. Ralph expressed concern about what he perceived as a departure from proper scientific methodology, including:

  • Dismissal of observational data without investigation
  • Reliance on modeling rather than real-world data
  • Suppression of hypothesis testing and scientific debate
  • Conflation of correlation with causation when convenient for prevailing narratives
  • Abandonment of the precautionary principle

Public Health Policy Implications

Dr. Morrissey suggested that the experience with COVID-19 vaccines should prompt reconsideration of:

  • Mass vaccination approaches versus targeted protection
  • The role of natural immunity in public health
  • Transparency requirements for novel medical interventions
  • The balance between pharmaceutical and lifestyle interventions
  • The independence of regulatory bodies from industry influence

Recommendations for Individuals

The doctors offered several recommendations for individuals concerned about these issues:

For Those Who Have Received COVID-19 Vaccines

  • Consider nattokinase, bromelain, and curcumin supplementation (with medical supervision)
  • Focus on anti-inflammatory lifestyle factors (diet, exercise, stress management)
  • Monitor for unusual symptoms and seek medical attention when needed
  • Consider regular health screenings, particularly for cardiovascular health
  • Avoid additional doses if adverse reactions occurred previously

For Medical Professionals

  • Maintain clinical vigilance for unusual patterns of illness
  • Document observations thoroughly
  • Consider potential vaccine-related mechanisms when evaluating new health issues
  • Remain open to emerging evidence, even when it challenges prevailing narratives
  • Prioritize patient welfare over institutional positions

Conclusion: The Need for Open Scientific Discussion

Dr. Morrissey and Dr. Ralph present a concerning perspective on the COVID-19 vaccine rollout based on their clinical observations, emerging scientific findings, and analysis of mortality data. Their testimony highlights the need for greater transparency, open scientific discussion, and thorough investigation of potential adverse effects.

While their views challenge prevailing narratives about COVID-19 vaccines, they represent important voices in ensuring medical interventions are continuously evaluated for safety and effectiveness. As Dr. Ralph emphasized, the medical profession must remain open to evidence that challenges established positions, particularly when patient wellbeing is at stake.

The doctors' observations raise important questions about the long-term health impacts of COVID-19 vaccines, the mechanisms by which they might cause harm, and the concerning patterns of excess mortality that have emerged since their widespread rollout. These questions deserve serious scientific investigation rather than dismissal.

Questions for Further Consideration

Based on the doctors' discussion, several important questions emerge that warrant further investigation:

  1. Batch Variability: Why did certain vaccine batches appear to be associated with significantly higher rates of adverse effects than others? Does this suggest quality control issues or potentially more concerning explanations?

  2. Excess Mortality: What explains the consistent 15-18% excess death rate in Ireland since July 2021, and why has there been limited official investigation into these concerning statistics?

  3. Cancer Rates: Why does Ireland have the second-highest cancer rates in Europe despite being a high GDP country with a relatively young population? Could there be connections to recent medical interventions?

  4. Early Treatment Suppression: Why were potentially effective early treatments like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine marginalized despite some evidence of efficacy against coronaviruses?

  5. Long-term Safety: What are the potential long-term effects of persistent Spike protein production in the body, and how might this affect various organ systems over time?

Perspectives on Medical Ethics and Informed Consent

Both doctors expressed concerns about the ethical implications of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, particularly regarding informed consent. Dr. Ralph noted that many patients were not fully informed about potential risks, the experimental nature of the technology, or alternative approaches.

Dr. Morrissey emphasized that medical ethics requires transparency about both benefits and risks, allowing patients to make truly informed decisions. He suggested that the pressure to achieve high vaccination rates may have compromised this fundamental principle of medical practice.

The doctors also discussed the concerning precedent of censoring medical professionals who raised questions about vaccine safety, noting that scientific progress depends on open inquiry and the ability to challenge prevailing narratives when evidence suggests they may be incomplete or incorrect.

Resources for Further Information

For those interested in exploring these topics further, the doctors recommended several resources:

  • Patrick Walsh's ongoing analysis of Irish mortality data
  • Dr. Peter McCullough's protocols for addressing post-vaccine symptoms
  • The work of Kevin McKernan and Dr. David Speicher on vaccine composition analysis
  • Norman Fenton's statistical analyses of vaccine efficacy claims
  • Dr. Tess Lawrie's meta-analyses of repurposed medications for COVID-19

They emphasized the importance of examining multiple sources of information and maintaining a critical perspective on both mainstream and alternative narratives about COVID-19 and related interventions.

Note: This article presents the perspectives and observations of the interviewed doctors and does not constitute medical advice. Readers should consult with their healthcare providers regarding any medical decisions.